Monday, May 25, 2009
Photo Shoot 1
Thursday, May 14, 2009
It's Over.
Monday, May 11, 2009
Confessions of a "last year" law student: On the Closing Road
43146
Research Diary
May 11, 2009
NYP Final Exam
May 7, 2009; 2:30 PM
Dear Diary,
I dislike you. But we are stuck with each other and therefore we must work as one and get to know one another. Despite your relevance, I can already tell you are going to be a thorn in my side. You are an inanimate object without a soul but I believe, if you could, you would be asking “why” right now. Well let me count the ways. First, I like to scribble, not type in a coherent, linear fashion. So as I scribble my notes, you will be anxiously awaiting for me to submit entries, jealously no doubt. Second, you will force me to document this horrific experience, causing me immeasurable pain as I attempt to narrate what I have found, or failed to find, when using technologically inept research sources, causing me to ramble on about my criticisms of legal “assisting” documents, while highlighting the nicer features only accepted in the life of a law student, and inevitably the lawyers. Finally, you will instill in me a certain robotic sense of being, similar to your own, in which I will hold empathy for you, resisting the day, in the near future, where you will become a love lost, and a constant reminder of the intimate days we shared together.
As I sit near my window on this stormy New York day, mid-afternoon, I must inform you that I am exhausted. You see I just spent three days conducting research of a different sort on the intricacies of intellectual property resulting in a beautiful and pithy prose on the fine art of legal drafting on such attractively deceptive topics as trademark, copyright, and patent sagas. As such, I will let you in on a little secret. I may not fully understand what I am doing, or what I am about to do.
I begin my research with an old saying from my undergraduate days, “Jason, begin with the forest and then focus on the trees.” Never you mind that conjures up thoughts of a lumberjack destroying the pristine Pacific Northwest, just understand that at first, we must get a broad overview of the subjects we are tackling. That said, I spent some time researching Employment Litigation generally as this is a case involving wrongfully withheld wages. I have become familiar with the elements in each cause of action in the complaint and now understand why this motion to compel discovery is fundamental to our case. Using Westlaw, NY Practice is a useful source of information for broad, but succinct, facets of law.
I then spent some time reviewing the purposes and procedural steps in disclosure actions generally. I made an executive decision to locate the required databases with mixed results. I’ll begin with the brighter side of life. McKinney’s Consolidated Laws Commentaries and Carmody Wait 2d Cyclopedia of New York Practice are easily accessible on Westlaw and even have Table of Contents access, making my time breezing through index numbers and disclosure topics much more bearable. However, the evil Weinstein Korn and Miller, New York Civil Practice have pledged allegience to the devil and can only be accessed through the database that is this lawyers worst nightmare: Lexis Nexus. Its proximity to Lex Luther should not be disregarded. To shed light on my disdain for our archenemy, let me digress by letting you know that while I will be soon cashing in my Westlaw points for trivial trinkets, I have accumulated exactly zero points in three years of law school over Lexis. Having worked for three different lawyers, I have deduced that only the insanely genius, or the economically required users, can manage this archaic database. That said, once finally accessed, this Cyclopedia is extremely helpful and covers more in breadth and substance and also host example forms, helpful to this now delusional student. Having secured a working knowledge of both the forest and the tools accessible to chop it down, I will retire to a much-needed slumber.
May 8, 2009. All Day.
Today I am reminded that I am a mere grasshopper in need of reminders from the esteemed sensei. Thus, “start early,” has not been lost on this researcher and has begun to haunt me like Mr. Poe’s Raven, “Nevermore” has been replaced with “start early.” I spent a considerable amount of time with Mr. Carmody today and have a solid foundation for precisely what is necessary for the scope of disclosure, pertinent to why I am asking for documents in the first place. Mr. Carmody has enlightened me as to the abstract ideas but has not been quite as illuminating telling me the “how.” For that, I returned to Lex Luther’s Cyclopedia. The forms were nice but it was rather irritating to be told that I couldn’t access most of them due to my “status” and something referring to a dollar sign. Fortunately copy and past functions well allowing me to access cases, briefs, and motions in the Kryptonite free world of Westlaw.
Naturally, Westlaw led me back to NY Practice, I pause to recall the days of old - nothing beats the Siegal NY Practice Treaties. Not only is it in tangible form, the man has been blessed with gifts not known to me at the time. Where he was confusing in other chapters, he is clear in Discovery. Westlaw also led me to use keycites of the most cited cases in NY, and the first department, regarding holdings I needed.
I ended the day with numerous flow charts, element visuals, and other self-made aids on good old-fashioned paper using a number 2 pencil.
May 9, 2009. ALL DAY TAKE TWO.
I have not left the apartment, and scarcely my room, in now 4 days. There are strange cryptic messages carved in the walls repeating an onerous theme: “start early… because it is beyond cavil that New York has a long favored open and far-reaching pretrial discovery.” What on earth is beyond cavil? What is short of cavil? What is cavil? Siegel and Mr. Carmody have convinced me that cavil is good for me, namely because I need open discovery as to these secret documents I came across. I have all but finished the first motion and with the help of Google, I have located rules specific to the Supreme Court in NY, as well as some common language used in these “draconian” documents. I have seen “draconian” far too often in the litany of opinions I have read in this dungeon.
I discussed the merits of the claims with a few attorney friends of mine and feel good about the direction I am going. They gave me a few more Westlaw hints (it’s popular!) and I have been diving through the CPLR using McKinney and the commentaries available from Westlaw after throwing the relevant CPLR provisions into the handy citation box located on the upper left of the Westlaw homepage. I have mapped out and outlined, on paper again, the rules, cases, and arguments for the second motion and seem to be trucking along. I ended my “day” around 11:30 (I realized that despite the fact the client would likely not pay, as a first-timer, I have decided to look at this as billable hours, convincing myself a paycheck is at the end of the road).
May 10, 2009. ALL DAY TAKE THREE.
28 years ago today, I was born. Coincidentally it was also Mother’s Day then, convincing me that my mother would receive great joy from the gift of 13 hour labor. Your welcome Mom!
Carmody has been by far the most useful of the three identified sources but I find myself spending more time using the actual CPLR book, Siegel’s treatise, and case citation features on Westlaw. I would have liked to have an example of a motion and brief on this particular issue but as Donald Rumsfeld cleverly said, “In this world there are knowns and unknowns…”, wait wrong quote, “You can’t go to war with the army you want, you have to go with the army you have.” So I found it useful to at least get a sense of the form and outline of the document and despite the fact that both Word and ALL Apple products are exceedingly irritating in editing legal documents, I have managed to get the rough drafts done. Hopefully they are right.
Siegel has some forms in the treatise and Westlaw has some examples as well. I have tried to conform to those, while keeping an eye on those darn CPLR and local court rules, and can only hope for the best. I can see the temptation in wanting to use a form from the book but at the same time, it seems like you would really need to make your own using the best practices of a bunch of them. That said, I have no idea if the way I compiled my ideas into one motion and supporting brief are “correct” but I think it gets the point across. The key example was the “good faith affirmation” required under the rules to which there are no forms, Siegel provides little guidance, and the rule itself if unclear as to what on earth it is supposed to look like. Your guess is my guess I suppose.
At the end of this marathon I recall the purposes of this exercise. As I suspected, I have grown quite fond of you despite your electronic distance. But it’s always good to look back at where you started and see if you have progressed. Looking back, I feel like a lawyer. Even if this whole thing results in a complete failure, I know what it feels like to be lost at sea with only the preserver of legal aids to keep you afloat. So I think I get it. You have an idea. You search to confirm that idea. You look around to see if others agree with you. You put it onto paper complying with intentional confusing legal language. Then, you pray, beg, and plead that the judge before whom you are to argue has sympathy on you and remembers what this was like.
I am not sure I would have done much differently other than perhaps accessing hard copies of things. I would keep that in mind for the future, hard copies help. I think I also would have started researching the “form” of the motions and the supporting papers before diving into the legal issues. That way I could just plug away onto an outline as opposed to taking my document template and then having to adapt it as I go. I also would have tried to understand the intricacies of Lexis if I had more time. The Cyclopedia was great but just hard to use in Lexis. I have a feeling it is more powerful than Lexis allows it to be.
So with that, I bid adieu to the NYP Final Exam Research Diary. It was great. Real great. I’ll call you… diary… I promise (wink implied).